home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ ftp.cs.arizona.edu / ftp.cs.arizona.edu.tar / ftp.cs.arizona.edu / icon / newsgrp / group99a.txt / 000246_icon-group-sender _Wed Dec 22 14:16:16 1999.msg < prev    next >
Internet Message Format  |  2000-09-20  |  1KB
  1. Return-Path: <icon-group-sender>
  2. Received: (from root@localhost)
  3.     by baskerville.CS.Arizona.EDU (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id OAA15934
  4.     for icon-group-addresses; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 14:11:17 -0700 (MST)
  5. Message-Id: <199912222111.OAA15934@baskerville.CS.Arizona.EDU>
  6. From: Art Eschenlauer <art.eschenlauer@sufsys.com>
  7. To: "'dgamey@ca.ibm.com'" <dgamey@ca.ibm.com>,
  8.         icon-group@optima.CS.Arizona.EDU
  9. Subject: RE: Y2k and Icon?
  10. Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 12:04:03 -0600
  11. Errors-To: icon-group-errors@optima.CS.Arizona.EDU
  12. Status: RO
  13.  
  14. I saw no reply to this question. What is the Y2K readiness of Icon
  15. implementations? I'm particularly interested in the DOS Command Line
  16. implementation.
  17.  
  18. -----Original Message-----
  19. From: dgamey@ca.ibm.com [mailto:dgamey@ca.ibm.com]
  20. Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 1999 3:13 PM
  21. To: icon-group@optima.CS.Arizona.EDU
  22. Subject: Y2k and Icon?
  23.  
  24.  
  25.  
  26.  
  27. Hi,
  28.  
  29. I haven't seen anything on Icon's Y2K readiness.   Did I miss it?  What's
  30. the
  31. status?
  32.  
  33. I expect I'll have to check all of my IPL contributions, is there a target
  34. date
  35. for this kind of activity?
  36.  
  37.  
  38. David
  39.  
  40.  
  41.  
  42.